Monday, April 7, 2014

Purity - Part II

A traveling evangelical ministry came to our school the other day.  They did a great job of presenting some thought-provoking material in a modern and challenging manner.  They covered a wide variety of topics, but the one most relevant to the students was their presentation on sexuality.  They contrasted the worldview of the entertainment industry to the worldview of evangelical Christianity.  To illustrate their point, they played snippets of popular secular songs with the lyrics displayed.  The lyrics presented sex as a good and fun thing, but completely disconnected from any sense of commitment, consequences, or as a part of an intimate experience between two human beings.

After a few such examples (each time the crowd singing along with gusto), the presenter said that we should instead consider what Jesus had to say about sexuality. 

27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30 And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.

With this passage from Matthew 5 displayed behind him, he said “The Bible teaches us that sex is a good thing within the right context and the Bible has given us clear guidelines to allow us freedom to fully enjoy our sexuality.”  It would have been funny if he hadn’t been serious, for the verse he displayed says nothing of the sort.  The verse he displayed, if it says anything at all about sexuality, says that sexuality is evil, so evil in fact, that if men cannot rid themselves of it, they should castrate themselves.  Nowhere in the passage does it say anything about sexuality being a good thing.

It reminded me of my own struggles as a single Christian.  Sex and sexuality was never discussed in my home, so I learned about “God’s view” from my youth and college groups.  The messages were similarly reductionist to the one this ministry presented:  Sex and sexuality is off limits until marriage.  If you think of such things before marriage, you are engaging in premarital sex and you must repent and ask God for forgiveness.  Every mens Bible study I’ve attended discusses this issue, and every “guys accountability group” I’ve joined had this as its major theme.  Thinking back on them now, I see that though they didn’t help us rid ourselves of our sexuality, they did help us see that our inability to do so was universal so that we didn’t feel quite so guilty about it.  In all of the groups I’ve attended through the years, the dogma of the evil of sexuality went unquestioned.

But now I see that this dogma is wrong.  In Matthew 5, Jesus wasn’t talking about our sexuality.  When Jesus uses the word “lust”, he was speaking of the type of carnal demand for immediate gratification that reduces a woman to a mere object.  In Jesus’ time, wives were considered the objective property of their husbands.  The lust that Jesus prohibits is the same faceless, relation-less sex that the song lyrics were promoting.  But this can in no way be interpreted as Jesus repudiating the essential goodness of our sexuality. 

Sexuality is an important part of what it is to be human, and not just a married human.  Just as we are emotional, spiritual, and intellectual beings, so we are also sexual beings.  We can try to “deny” our emotions or intellect all we want, but we will still end up feeling and thinking.  Our sexuality is more than our ability to have sex, our “orientation”, or our libido.  It is the mystical interplay between a man’s masculinity and a woman’s femininity.  Men naturally aspire to masculinity and all that it may represent to them (e.g. strength, courage, stability, justice, reason, determination), and yet they yearn for intimacy with nothing less than femininity. 

The sexuality of a woman awakens a man and makes his senses come alive.  She causes him to recognize his own manhood.  She reminds him that he does not exist alone in his own universe, but that others are here and that he exists within community.  God has given him purpose.  He can be a physical, intellectual, emotional, and spiritual being and be completely alone, but because he is also a sexual being he is driven to be in relationship.  Our sexuality acts as an unrelenting herdsman, rounding up all the other aspects of our humanity and plunging us headlong into intimacy.

Story tellers and movie makers will tell us that anticipation is a good thing in and of itself.  We anticipate a perfect union with God after death and this anticipation is expressed through worship.  Our sexuality drives us to anticipate physical intimacy.  This sexual tension is part of the gift of sexuality.  Sensuality is not confined to the act of intercourse.  We anticipate the look in her eyes, the softness of her touch, the sound of her voice, her smell, her taste.  Our sexuality encompasses this joy of anticipation. I do not write these words as mere hyperbole.  I have experienced this ecstasy of life.  While remaining chaste, I have held a woman close while every aspect of my being desperately yearns to become one.  This too is part of sexuality, and it is exceedingly good.
 
Something so utterly good must have been Satan’s first target.  Outside the church he uses our selfishness to separate sexuality from intimacy.  Within the church he uses our legalism and pride to get us to label this great gift “evil”, and to spend all of our young lives reading books, attending rallies, and joining accountability groups to deny this essential part of us. 

And what are the results of all of our programs?  The single man earnestly tries denying his sexuality but he cannot rid himself of this any more than he can rid himself of his intellect or his emotions.  Dejectedly he seeks and prays for God to take these feelings away, but in God’s goodness and mercy He refuses.  God will not take away the very gift He has designed to allow man to experience life most keenly.  So man’s ineffectual flailing at this unholy dissonance continues and a severe frustration builds. 

Many men will look for somewhere to place the blame for their miserable condition and the woman becomes an easy scapegoat.  They will blame her for these unstoppable “evil” feelings.  She must be dressing wrong.  She must be a flirt, or “leading them on”.  She is “causing her brothers to stumble” or some other cobbled together mishmash of Bible-speak.   Dress codes dictating hem line, shoulder strap width, and inseam length are sure to follow.  Even in today’s modern world we see the robes and burqas that result from this sort of religious misogyny.  It leads to a perversion of reasoning that claims that since man cannot stop being a sexual being, he likewise cannot stop his actions, and it is the woman’s own fault when she experiences leers, catcalls, whistles, pinches, gropes and rapes.

Many other men will recognize (consciously or not) that what they have been taught must be wrong.  If they believe that the only other alternative is the world’s view of casual sex, they may adopt that view.  Others will simply sink under the suffocating guilt, quietly suffering and every day learning to hate their sexuality.


The evangelical community must reclaim the goodness of sexuality from the world’s crass objectification of women and from our own bleak tradition of sexual Gnosticism.  The church should represent the beauty of God and the abundant life to needy world.  The contrast between what God intends and the what the world offers for our sexuality could not be more stark.  Christianity can offer a complete, fulfilling, enriching and beautiful view of sexuality.  Our failure to do so is not just a lost opportunity to make Christianity “attractive”, but ultimately it is the denial of a very good gift of God’s creation.